Employment Rights (Dispute Resolution) Act 1998 ss.7 and 8
The ACAS Arbitration Scheme (Great Britain) Order 2004, SI 2004/753
The ACAS (Flexible Working) Arbitration Scheme (Great Britain) Order 2004, SI 2004/2333



NOTES

  • Employment Rights (Dispute Resolution) Act 1998 s.7 is entitled "ACAS arbitration scheme" (introducing TULRCA 1992 s.212A)
  • Employment Rights (Dispute Resolution) Act 1998 s.8 is entitled "Effect of arbitration agreements"
  • The ACAS Arbitration Scheme (Great Britain) Order 2004, SI 2004/753 (replacing with effect from 6th April 2004 the ACAS Arbitration Scheme (England and Wales) Order 2001 SI 2001/1185)
  • The ACAS (Flexible Working) Arbitration Scheme (Great Britain) Order 2004 SI 2004/2333) (replacing with effect from 1st October 2004 the ACAS (Flexible Working) Arbitration Scheme (England and Wales) Order 2003 SI 2003/694).


    BASIC POSITION


    ACAS has had arbitration powers "where a trade dispute exists or is apprehended" for many years (
    TULRCA 1992, s.212). The arbitration scheme introduced in 2001 (and modified with effect from 6th April 2004) is quite different in that it provides for arbitration in cases of individual unfair dismissal disputes. With effect from 6th April 2003 the scheme was extended to cover voluntary resolution of disputes in relation to the statutory right to request flexible working .

    As from 6th April 2004 the original unfair dismissal arbitration scheme was replaced by a version which applies to Scotland as well as to England and Wales (see the ACAS Arbitration Scheme (Great Britain) Order 2004, SI 2004/753). As from 1st October 2004 the flexible working arbitration scheme is also replaced by a version which applies to Scotland as well as England and Wales (see the ACAS (Flexible Working) Arbitration Scheme (Great Britain) Order 2004, SI 2004/2333.

    The main differences beween settling unfair dismissal and flexible working disputes by ACAS arbitration rather than by going to an employment tribunal are the relative informality, speed and private nature of arbitrations (with resulting cost savings) as compared to tribunals. Awards which can be made are the same in both. The government is keen to encourage informal settlement of employment disputes - the ACAS arbitration scheme is one reflection of this. Another, in some ways perhaps more significant, is the introduction of new grievance procedures from 1st October 2004, the practical effect of which is that employment tribunals must reject most applications unless a serious attempt at an out-of-court settlement has been made.

    Further information is in the notes at ACAS/arbitration scheme/the scheme . See also notes at ACAS/arbitration scheme/enforcement and appeals and/or at Mediation and ADR generally.


    FINISH>
    updated July2006




  • Dates appearing after the "FINISH >" sign above refer to date of preparation of, or most recent update to, this page.
  • Throughout this site main notes are on this colour background. Recent developments (during approx the last 9 to 12 months) are on this colour background and marked "rd" in the index(es).
  • IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER NOTICE:- Use of this site is subject to terms and conditions.