High Court, QBD on 18th February 2008, reported at [2008] ICR 702 (also at [2008] IRLR 380)
Representation:
The High Court (Wyn Williams J) has now ordered that the injunction will stay in place until 8th May 2008. At that date the JIRPA ends but a new statutory ban on strikes will be in place (see Criminal Justice & Immigration Bill 2008).
Both sides agreed that the strike breached the legally binding agreement. However, the POA argued that the Ministry was not entitled to an injunction, as it had behaved inequitably because it had "intentionally refused to provide adequate compensatory measures as recompense for the prohibition upon striking in the JIRPA." This was because the Pay Review Body could not reach independent binding decisions.
The court rejected this. The Ministry had declined to follow the PRB's recommendations due to "exceptional circumstances" (in this case affordability). It was part of the agreement with the POA that it could do so. It had therefore behaved perfectly equitably, and done nothing to undermine the spirit of the JIRPA. It was entitled to the injunction, which was granted.
For relevant general notes see Specific employments/prison officers and/or Bills before Parliament/Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill .