Representation:
in order for indirect discrimination contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 SI 2003/1660 to be established, it must be possible to make some general statements which would be true about a religious group such that an employer ought reasonably to be able to appreciate that any particular provision may have a disparate adverse impact on the group.
emplaw editor's note:
Ms Eweida appealed to the Court of Appeal against this EAT judgment but lost again in February 2010 - see Eweida v British Airways Plc CA 2010 ICR 890.
For relevant general notes see Religious discrimination/new regulations 2003