Mr & Mrs Liversidge and Mrs Balmain were employed by Atlas and worked as cleaners at Zara stores.
Atlas Cleaning Ltd v (1) Liversidge (2) Liversidge (3) Balmain - tribunal must limit itself to considering whether dismissal fell within range of reasonable responses, not substitute its own views of what it would have done - EAT 2.4.08
bailii - 01/05/08
Emplaw Links:
Subscribe to Emplaw Professional now to get the full benefit of our news service
Subscribers to emplaw professional get full access to our news service, along with 5,000 pages of comprehensive, up-to-date information, covering all aspects of employment law in our Law Guide.
To read the full content of the above article, including links to relevant web sites and Law Guide pages, you can subscribe today to one of our daily, monthly or annual packages.
You can also sign-up to our e-PSL email newsletter, which will keep you up-to-date with the latest developments every week.
Other articles in Cases - Employment Appeal Tribunal:
-
Ritchie v (1) Shawcor Inc (2) Omsco Inc - undertaking must be situated in the UK immediately prior to transfer to fall within jurisdiction of TUPE - EAT 6.3.08
The issues in this case concerned a claim of unfair dismissal in connection with a TUPE transfer.
Read More. -
Carpenter v City of Edinburgh Council - delay, the right to a fair trial, and blots on the landscape! - EAT 4.4.08
Mr Carpenter brought claims of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal.
Read More. -
Atlas Cleaning Ltd v (1) Liversidge (2) Liversidge (3) Balmain - tribunal must limit itself to considering whether dismissal fell within range of reasonable responses, not substitute its own views of what it would have done - EAT 2.4.08
Mr & Mrs Liversidge and Mrs Balmain were employed by Atlas and worked as cleaners at Zara stores.
Read More. -
Miles v Linkage Community Trust Ltd - compensation for denial of rest periods under Working Time Regulations is discretionary - EAT 10.3.08
The Working Time Regulations Regs 1998 regs 21 & 24 provide that where a worker's activities involve the need for continuous service and working through a rest break (such as in a hospital) he must be given "compensatory rest".
Read More. -
McKindless Group v McLaughlin - uplift in compensation is only in respect of failure to comply with statutory procedures, and cannot be used as a general punitive measure - EAT 2.4.08
Bus Company McKindless dismissed a driver Mr McLaughlin.
Read More. -
Johnson v Edwardian International Hotels Ltd - employment tribunals have no powers to embark on investigation into a litigant's mental capacity - EAT 2.5.08
Mr Johnson claimed unfair dismissal from his job as a kitchen porter.
Read More.
