The Court of Appeal tries to clearly define the scope of discrimination on the grounds of religious belief, making clear the distinction between action taken on the grounds of belief, as against that taken on the basis of how a person chooses to manifest their belief. It also makes clear that a particular viewpoint - such as refusing to counsel same sex couples - will not acquire automatic legal protection simply because it is based in a religion.
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd - a particular viewpoint will not be protected at law simply because it has its basis in a religious precept
Court of Appeal - 29/04/10
Emplaw Links:
Subscribe to Emplaw Professional now to get the full benefit of our news service
Subscribers to emplaw professional get full access to our news service, along with 5,000 pages of comprehensive, up-to-date information, covering all aspects of employment law in our Law Guide.
To read the full content of the above article, including links to relevant web sites and Law Guide pages, you can subscribe today to one of our daily, monthly or annual packages.
You can also sign-up to our e-PSL email newsletter, which will keep you up-to-date with the latest developments every week.
Other articles in Cases - Other:
-
Webster & Ors v Ridgeway Foundation School - school did not breach general "public authority duty" under RRA 1976 sec 71
Not an employment case, but a negligence claim against a school.
Read More. -
Milford Haven Port Authority v UNITE - technicalities of notice by a union to an employer about impending industrial action
A single notice of proposed industrial action given by a union to an employer can be sufficient for both continuous and discontinuous action, providing that the notice otherwise satisfies the requirements of the legislation.
Read More. -
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Scullion - cardiac arrest was not, in itself, an "accident" for industrial injuries benefit purposes
A cardiac arrest is an injury, and it is not in itself an "accident" so as to qualify for industrial injuries benefit. "Injury" and "accident" are distinct concepts.
Read More. -
Unite, McCartney & Ors v Nortel Networks UK Ltd (in adminstration) - money claim can only proceed against company in administration if "exceptional"
A monetary claim must be "exceptional" before the Court will exercise its discretion in favour of permitting it to proceed despite the statutory moratorium on proceedings against a company in administration.
Read More. -
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd - a particular viewpoint will not be protected at law simply because it has its basis in a religious precept
The Court of Appeal tries to clearly define the scope of discrimination on the grounds of religious belief, making clear the distinction between action taken on the grounds of belief, as against that taken on the basis of how a person chooses to manifest their belief. It also makes clear that a particular viewpoint - such as refusing to counsel same sex couples - will not acquire automatic legal protection simply because it is based in a religion.
Read More.