Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique - annual leave entitlement cannot be subject to preconditions
CJEC Case C282/10 - 24/01/12
A worker's entitlement to annual leave cannot be made subject to any preconditions whatsoever. Member states may set national rules on how the entitlement is actually exercised, but laws such as a requirement to actually work 10 days before the entitlement even arises breach the Working Time Directive.
Furthermore, the Working Time Directive has "direct effect" in national law, meaning that it can be directly enforced by public sector employees.
Full article (456 words) available only to subscribers.
Subscribe to Emplaw Professional now to get the full benefit of our news service
Subscribers to emplaw professional
get full access to our news service, along with 5,000 pages of comprehensive, up-to-date information,
covering all aspects of employment law in our Law Guide.
To read the full content of the above article, including links to
relevant web sites and Law Guide pages, you can subscribe today to one
of our daily, monthly or annual packages.
You can also sign-up to our e-PSL email newsletter, which will keep you up-to-date with the latest developments every week.
Sign Up to e-PSL
More Information about Emplaw Professional
Other articles in Cases - Other:
-
Court of Appeal upholds refusal to extend time: it is for an EAT judge to exercise the discretion as to whether or not to extend time for appeal; in the absence of his decision falling outside that scope, by being perverse or unreasonable, the Court of Appeal will not interfere.
Read More.
-
POA challenges prohibition on right to take industrial action in ECtHR
Read More.
-
A worker's entitlement to annual leave cannot be made subject to any preconditions whatsoever. Member states may set national rules on how the entitlement is actually exercised, but laws such as a requirement to actually work 10 days before the entitlement even arises breach the Working Time Directive.
Furthermore, the Working Time Directive has "direct effect" in national law, meaning that it can be directly enforced by public sector employees.
Read More.
-
Whether an employer is vicariously liable for a criminal assault by one of his employees on another will depend on whether there is a sufficiently close connection between the assault and the employment (such as the spontaneous violent reaction to a lawful instruction given in the workplace). The principle of vicarious liability is limited as a matter of policy, and each case will turn on its own facts.
Read More.