Redundancy
- Elkouil v Coney Island Ltd EAT 2002
- Euroguard Ltd v Rycroft EAT 1993
- Evans, Motture & Hutchins v Permacell Finess Ltd (In administration) - Amount of protective award on employer's failure to consult on mass redundancy [2007] EAT
- Fisher v Hoopoe Finance Ltd EAT [2005] UKEAT 0043_05_0206
- Fleming v Sec'y of State (DTI) CS 1997
- Flintshire County Council & Ors v Moore & Anor - Redundancy: a proper period for consultation is essential to ensure fairness in all respects [2011] EAT
- Framptons Ltd v Badger & ors - Enhanced redundancy payments [2006] EAT
- Fulcrum Pharma (Europe) Ltd v Bonassera & Anor - Fair redundancy consultation should include size of pool for selection [2010] EAT
- GMB and TGWU v Lambeth Service Team Ltd and Cleanaway Ltd - Redundancy and penalty for failure to consult staff [2005] EAT
- GMB v Amicus; Amicus v Beloit Walmsley Ltd (in administration) and ors EAT 2003
- GMB v Man Truck & Bus UK Ltd EAT 2000
- Graff Diamonds Ltd v Boatwright - A Tribunal must state its findings on the veracity of evidence [2011] EAT
- Great Restaurants Ltd v Mizener - Payment in lieu was not "appropriated" to redundancy payment, which was therefore still owing [2009] EAT
- Grewal v London Borough of Barnet - Claim form stating intention to claim unfair dismissal in the future cannot amount to unfair dismissal claim [2007] EAT
- Gwynedd Council v Barratt and other UKEAT 0206/18
- Halpin v Sandpiper Books Ltd - Selection for redundancy and a pool of one [2012] UKEAT 0171_11_0602
- Hammersmith & Queen Charlotte's v Cato EAT 1988
- Harford & ors v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry - Only employees who are covered by specific wording of protective award can claim under it [2008] EAT
- Harvest Town Circle Ltd v Rutherford EAT 2001
- Hendy Banks City Print Ltd v Fairbrother & ors EAT 2005
- Hilaire v Luton Borough Council [2022] EAT 166
- Hinton v Argos Ltd - No error in tribunal rejecting whistle-blowing claim [2011] EAT
- Home Office v Evans and Laidlaw - Civil Service redundancies [2006] EAT
- Howlett Marine Services Ltd v Bowlam & ors EAT 2001
- Independent Insurance Company Ltd (in liquidation) v Aspinall and O'Callaghan - Protective awards are not "collective" [2011] EAT
- Inns Recruitment Ltd v Cockburn - Employee cannot be laid-off at reduced wage once he has been dismissed [2008] EAT
- Invectec (Scotland) Corporation Ltd v Duffy - Redundancy payment must be deducted from unfair dismissal compensation [2007] EAT
- Junk v Wolfgang Kuhnel, ECJ 2005
- Kachelmann v Bankhaus Hermann Lampe KG (ECJ) 2001
- Kaur v MG Rover Group Ltd CA 2004
- Keeping Kids Company v. Smith & Ors [2018] UKEAT 0057/17
- Kellogg Brown & Root (UK) Ltd v Fitton [2016] UKEAT/0205
- Key Organics Ltd v Billington - Tribunal's reasoning behind Polkey assessment simply could not be understood [2010] EAT
- King v Royal Bank Of Canada Europe Ltd - Dismissal for redundancy no reason for tribunal not to consider remedy of reinstatement [2011] EAT
- Kraft Foods UK Ltd v Hastie - Contractual redundancy pay cap and age discrimination [2010] EAT
- Kvaerner Oil and Gas Ltd v Parker & ors EAT 2003
- Leicestershire City Council v UNISON - Redundancy consultation in light of ECJ rulings [2005] EAT
- Lewis v Rhyal Engineering [2005] EAT - compensation for failure to consult on redundancy
- Lionel Leventhal Ltd v North EAT 2004
- Lomond Motors Ltd v Clark - Employers have wide measure of flexibility when selecting redundancy pool [2009] EAT
- Look Ahead Housing & Care Ltd v (1) Odili (2) Mendes - Tribunal must not substitute its own view in assessment of candidates in redundancy situation [2008] EAT
- Loosley v Social Action for Health - Redundancy following customer's dissatisfaction with a particular employee [2007] EAT
- Loxley v BAE Systems Land Systems (Munitions & Ordnance) Ltd EAT 2008
- LTI Ltd v Radford 2001
- Lyttle and ors v Bluebird UK Bidco (C-182/13); Cañas v Nexea Gestión Documental SA, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (C-392/13); USDAW and anor v WW Realisation 1 Ltd (in liquidation) and anor (C-80/14) [2015]
- Lyttle and others v Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Ltd (C-182/13); Cañas v Nexea Gestión Documental and another (C-392/13), USDAW and anor v WW Realisation 1 Ltd and ors (C-80/14)
- MacCulloch v Imperial Chemical Industries Plc - Finding that age discrimination was justified must involve detailed and thorough consideration of the question of proportionality [2008] EAT
- MacDonald v Frank's International - 100% Polkey reduction appropriate where dismissal in any event was a "virtual certainty" [2007] EAT
- Mann and ors v Secretary of State for Employment 1999
- Marclean Technologies (Judgment) French Text [2020] EUECJ C-300/19