Redundancy
- Market One Europe LLP v Rojas - Unreasonable treatment is not necessarily discriminatory treatment [2012] EAT
- Marshall v Southampton and SW Hants Health (No 1) 1986
- Martland, Newbold & Scott v Cooperative Insurance Society Ltd, Sculley, Mitchell, Mace & Booth v Cooperative Insurance Society Ltd - Does change in tasks make work sufficiently "of a different kind" so as to create redundancy situation? [2008] EAT
- Murray & anor v Foyle Meats Ltd 1999
- Nesbitt &anor. v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry - Directors and majority shareholders can still be employees [2007] EAT
- Nicholls v Rockwell Automation Ltd [2012] EAT
- North Yorkshire County Council v Fay CA 1985
- Northgate HR v Mercy - Redundancy and protective award [2007] EAT
- Optare Group Ltd. v T&G - Were more or less than 20 employees dismissed when 3 accepted voluntary redundancy and 17 did not? [2007] EAT
- Optical Express Ltd v Ms L Williams - Statutory trial period on redundancy is exclusive [2007] EAT
- Optical Express v Williams EAT 2007
- Packman (t/a Packman Lucas Associates) v Fauchon [2012] EAT
- Palihakkara v British Telecommunications Plc - Defective compromise agreement [2006] EAT
- Palmer & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates' Court [2021] EWHC 3013 (Admin)
- Peninsula Business Services Ltd v Rees, Mclachlan and Jaffier - [2011] UKEAT 0407_10_2104
- Philip Hodges v Kell 1994
- Phillips v Xtera Communications Ltd - Employee representatives for redundancy consultation purposes [2011] EAT
- Pinewood Repro Ltd t-a County Print v Page EAT 2011
- Pinewood Repro Ltd t/a County Print v Page - Selection for redundancy [2010] EAT
- Porras Guisado v Bankia SA and others (C-102/16)
- Potter v Sound Control Modern Music Stores Ltd - Default judgement in absence of response cannot dismiss parts of the claim [2009] EAT
- Pujante Rivera Gestora Clubs Dir SL and another C-422/14
- R (Foster) v Eastbourne Borough Council CA 2004
- R v British Coal etc ex p Vardy & ors 1993
- Ralph Martindale & Co Ltd v. Harris - Selection for redundancy [2007] EAT
- Rice v Walker t/a Kitchen Shop - Redundancy, sex discrimination and failure to give reasons [2005] EAT
- Roadbeach Ltd v Werner - Failure to offer an oral hearing on appeal against selection for redundancy need not render dismissal procedurally unfair [2007] EAT
- Rogers v Slimma Plc - Redundancy consultation [2007] EAT
- Rolls-Royce PLC v Unite The Union CA 2009
- Royston v The Symphony Group Plc - Selection for redundancy [2006] EAT
- Rutherford v DTI (Secy of State) CA 2004
- Rutherford v DTI (Secy of State) HL 2006
- Safeway Stores plc v Burrell 1997
- Samels v The University For The Creative Arts - Percentage of Polkey deduction question of fact for tribunal [2011] EAT
- Samels v University of Creative Arts - in a redundancy situation there is no obligation on an employer to consider "bumping"
- Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Monte-D’Cruz - Subjectivity of criteria used in assessment for alternative posts [2012] EAT
- Sanmina Sci UK Ltd v W McCormack - Tribunal not bound of its own motion to consider outcome if redundancy selection had been properly applied [2006] EAT
- Sec'y of State (DTI) v Bottrill 1999
- Sec'y of State for Employment v J Woodrow & Sons 1983
- Sec'y of State for Trade and Industry v Walden 2000
- Sefton Borough Council v Wainwright [2014] UKEAT/0168/14
- Semple Fraser LLP v Daly - Selection for redundancy and unfair dismissal [2010] EAT
- Shanahan Engineering Ltd v Unite - Special circumstances did not totally relieve employer of any obligation to consult on redundancy [2010] EAT
- Simpson v Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd & Ors EAT 2011
- Smith and anor v Cherry Lewis Ltd (in receivership) EAT 2005
- Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews & ors - Polkey deductions [2007] EAT
- St Aubyn v Willis - Respondent named was not claimant's employer, his company was [2011] EAT
- Stanco Exhibitions Plc v Wright - Tribunal is right to speculate on what might have happened had proper dismissal and consultation procedures been followed [2007] EAT
- Stewart v Drumbow Homes Ltd - Compensation was correctly assessed at lower salary [2009] EAT
- Susie Radin Ltd v GMB and ors CA 2004