GFTU Emplaw Emplaw Emplaw

Case Summaries

This section contains 100’s of professionally prepared case summaries relevant to employment law. They report decisions from the tribunals and courts of the UK and Europe and are updated as important new cases arise.

(54) | ( (4) | 1 (1) | 8 (1) | A (508) | B (653) | C (732) | D (375) | E (257) | F (284) | G (334) | H (473) | I (111) | J (181) | K (236) | L (327) | M (581) | N (231) | O (140) | P (329) | Q (23) | R (515) | S (718) | T (317) | U (110) | V (91) | W (339) | X (15) | Y (32) | Z (26)
Title Author Case Date
Blue Chip Trading v Helbawi - Illegality of contract did not prevent minimum wage claim [2008] EAT admin 20/11/2008
British Airways Plc v Unite the Union - injunction to stop strike granted: all required ballot information was apparently not communicated to members admin
Birmingham City Council v Samuels - Court of Appeal to consider admin
Barclays Bank plc v James EAT 1990 admin 10/01/1990
BMI Healthcare Ltd. v Spaulding & anor - tribunal's failure to give reasons - EAT 16.1.07 admin
Bournemouth University v Buckland EAT 2009 admin 08/05/2009
Brown v Rentokil Ltd ECJ 1998 admin 30/06/1998
Beresford v (1) Sovereign House Estates (2) Humphries - The permissible bases for joining a third party as a respondent [2011] EAT admin 29/11/2011
Brown v London Borough of Croydon and Johnston - burden of proof in discrimination cases - new on EAT website 21.3.06 admin
Brixton chief Tim Wheeler took his eye off the job, tribunal rules admin
Brooks v United Kingdom - Widow's benefits and sex discrimination - ECtHR 18.3.08 admin
Brown v Chief Adjudication Officer CA 1997 admin 10/10/1996
Beattie v Leicester City Council - teaching support staff were employed by Governing Bodies, not Local Education Authority admin
British Medical Association v Chaudhary EAT 2004 admin 24/03/2004
Bird v Sylvester CA 2007 admin 04/10/2007
Brennan v J.H. Dewhurst Ltd EAT 1984 admin 20/05/2003
Baker v Tote Bookmakers Ltd t/a Totesport - Claimant's lies do not automatically trigger costs order [2012] EAT admin 16/05/2012
Berry v Recruitment Revolution and Ors - Age discrimination claims about job advertisements in which claimant had no genuine interest [2010] EAT admin 06/10/2010
Bowater & ors v NIS Signs Ltd (in liquidation) & ors - TUPE exemption applied where company was in liquidation, even where that was "engineered" admin
Bosmann v Bundesagentur für Arbeit Familienkasse Aachen - rules to avoid duplication of benefits by member states do not prevent state of residence paying child benefit - ECJ Case 352/06 - 20.5.08 admin
Balfron Trustees Ltd v Peterson & ors Ch D 2001 admin 09/07/2001
Bottomley & Others v Wakefield District Housing - where the TUPE regulations apply a grievance can meet the minimum statutory requirements if it is addressed to the transferor rather than transferee employer - EAT 8.1.08 admin
Byrne Brothers (Formwork) Ltd v Baird & ors EAT 2002 admin 18/09/2001
Bower v. Stevens and anor CA 2004 admin 06/04/2004
Barratt v Accrington & Rosendale College EAT 2007 admin 12/01/2007
Boardman v Nugent Care Society admin
Baraheni v Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust - Disproportionate disclosure requests and allegations of fraud [2011] EAT admin 13/06/2011
Blanka Soukupova v Ministerstvo zemedelstvi - normal retirement age should not be determined on gender and number of children admin
Basic Solutions Ltd v Sands - balance of convenience against granting injunction where only real aim was generally to limit competition - QBD 23.6.08 admin
Brandeaux Advisers (UK) Ltd and Ors v Chadwick HC 2011 admin 17/12/2010
Blackford Farms Ltd v Mulqueeney - facts unknown to an employer at time of dismissal can affect compensation but cannot justify dismissal admin
British Coal Corporation v Keeble EAT 1997 admin 06/07/1995
B v. A EAT 2007 admin 03/04/2007
Balfour Beatty Power Networks Ltd & anor v Wilcox, Seymour and ors EAT 2005 admin 02/11/2005
Butt v Bradford Metropolitan District Council - responsibility to teachers of (i) School Governors and (ii) Local Authorities admin
Baxter & ors (submultiple of Surtees litigation) v Middlesbrough BC - Job evaluation for purposes of brief to Counsel was subject to privilege [2008] EAT admin 10/07/2008