GFTU Emplaw Emplaw Emplaw

Case Summaries

This section contains 100’s of professionally prepared case summaries relevant to employment law. They report decisions from the tribunals and courts of the UK and Europe and are updated as important new cases arise.

(54) | ( (4) | 1 (1) | 8 (1) | A (514) | B (656) | C (736) | D (376) | E (259) | F (289) | G (338) | H (475) | I (115) | J (181) | K (238) | L (329) | M (588) | N (233) | O (140) | P (335) | Q (25) | R (524) | S (729) | T (323) | U (112) | V (92) | W (340) | X (16) | Y (32) | Z (27)
Title Case Date
Aberdeen Steak Houses Group plc v Ibrahim EAT 1988 25/04/1988
Aziz v Trinity Street Taxis Ltd CA 1988 26/02/1988
Alexander v Home Office CA 1988 12/02/1988
Addison v Babcock FATA Ltd CA 1987 05/03/1987
Apex Leisure Hire v Barratt EAT 1984 09/02/1984
Airfix Footwear Ltd v Cope EAT 1978 28/06/1978
Abernethy v Mott, Hay and Anderson CA 1974 06/02/1974
Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation CA 1947 10/11/1947
A v B
A v B - dismissal was fair following allegations of criminal behaviour, although without any conviction, and anonymity could be preserved
A v B - High Court has jurisdiction for judicial review of decision to prevent publication by ex-Security Services officer - QBD 4.7.08
A v B - High Court has jurisidiction for judicial review of decision to prevent publication by ex-Security Services officer - QBD 4.7.08
A v B - spent conviction must be relevant to issue before the court
A v B - tribunal decision unlikely to be "plainly and unarguably right" where it completely failed to address relevant matters
A v B and Anor - Tribunal should be slow to strike out unfair dismissal claim if earlier discrimination-related grievance may have influenced employer
A v B and C - only cases that are "merely fanciful" should be dismissed as having "no reasonable prospects of success"
A v Secretary of State, Home Office - for a statement to be "false" for the purposes of the Immigration Rules, it must be dishonest.
AA & Others (Pakistan) - legitmate expectations and the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme - UKAIT 8.1.08
AB & Ors v British Coal Corporation & Anor - British Coal Respiratory Disease Litigation - High Court (QBD) 18.5.07
AB & Ors v British Coal Corporation (Department of Trade & Industry) - success for claimants in the Respiratory Disease Litigation - High Court (QBD) 27.6.07