GFTU Emplaw Emplaw Emplaw

Bevan Ashford v Malin EAT 1994

  • Case Summary

An example of the facts that

  1. a disciplinary warning to an employee cannot be relied on after its expiry date; and
  2. ambiguous language in a document will normally be construed against the party who drafted it.


Outline Facts

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Case Summary Tag: 

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.