AQ Ltd v Holden - failure to seek earlier PHR or strike out properly tells against success in costs application

In considering, and rejecting, an application for costs on the basis that a claim was vexatious, an employment tribunal is fully entitled to take into account the fact that the respondent (who now seeks costs) took no steps during the proceedings to seek a PHR to canvass the point, apply for a strike out or a deposit order. 

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.