Aziz v Crown Prosecution Service - adverse views expressed by ET not a bar to their adjudicating a remedy

Adverse views expressed by an ET do not in themselves necessitate a recusal

Ms Aziz, a solicitor who worked for the CPS, appealed from an ET judgment by which the ET recused themselves from further participation in proceedings on her claims. She contended that the ET erred in law and reached a perverse conclusion in recusing themselves. Further she contended that the recusal was an infringement of her right to a fair trial.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.