GFTU Emplaw Emplaw Emplaw

Born London Ltd v Spire Production Services Ltd [2017] UKEAT 0255/16/2803

Incorrect statement about bonus was not a breach of Regulation 11 TUPE

In this case, Born had taken over a contract from Spire in circumstances that amounted to a service provision change for TUPE purposes.  In providing information to Born prior to the transfer, Spire had stated that a non-contractual Christmas bonus was in place.  Born contended that this was wrong: in fact the bonus was contractual in nature and Spire had given incorrect employee liability information for the purposes of regulation 11 TUPE. 

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Case Summary Tag: 

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.