Brunel University & anor v Professor Vaseghi & anor - Admissibility of "without prejudice" discussions [2006] EAT

At a preliminary hearing an employment tribunal (Watford) ruled that "without prejudice" discussions for settlement of a race discrimination/victimisation claim would be inadmissible in evidence at the full hearing but that a written report of the employing University's Grievance Panel including such evidence was admissible on the basis of waiver or abuse of privileged occasion.

The employee appealed against the first ruling and the employer against the second.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.