CA, RA, RB and RC v News Group Newspapers Limited [2016] UKEAT 0075/16

Restricted Reporting Order survives settlement

In CA, RA, RB and RC v News Group Newspapers the EAT has held that an ET had jurisdiction to consider an extant restricted reporting order (RRO) notwithstanding the fact that the claims had been withdrawn on settlement. Nor did the RRO expire automatically upon withdrawal of the claim. Rule 50(1) of the 2013 Rules permits RROs that are wider in extent and circumstances than RROs permitted under section 11 Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and Rule 50(3)(d) of the 2013 Rules.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.