This website uses cookies to help us give you the best experience when you visit our website. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies.
Coats v Strathclyde Fire Board - No perversity in finding that no detriment was suffered as result of protected disclosure [2009] EAT
Coats v Strathclyde Fire Board - No perversity in finding that no detriment was suffered as result of protected disclosure [2009] EAT
The test for whether an employee has suffered a detriment is "whether a reasonable worker would or might take the view that the treatment he received was to his detriment" .
The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.