Cook, Ardley, Forrest, King and Smith v C2C Rail Ltd - Holiday pay in respect of ‘Annual hours contract’ [2006] EAT

The Employment Tribunal did not err in law when it construed the Claimants’ contracts based upon 1,930 annual hours in exchange for an annual salary as not including a right to an additional 22/24 days’ pay in respect of holidays

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Case Summary Tag: 

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.