Iteshi v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham - New evidence allowed but strike-out nonetheless upheld [2011] EAT

An automated acknowledgement for an ET1 received by email at 23.37 hours (and thus 23 minutes in time) could be adduced as new evidence on appeal where the ET1 served on the Respondent was date-stamped with the following day's date and would have been out of time.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.