Lyttle and ors v Bluebird UK Bidco (C-182/13); Cañas v Nexea Gestión Documental SA, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (C-392/13); USDAW and anor v WW Realisation 1 Ltd (in liquidation) and anor (C-80/14) [2015]

Meaning of ‘establishment’ for the purposes of collective redundancy: Redundancy/ consultation with employees

The Advocate General has given his Opinion on three cases which had not been formally joined but which all concerned the scope of the concept of ‘establishment’ for the purposes of collective information and consultation under the Collective Redundancies Directive (No.98/59): Lyttle and ors v Bluebird UK Bidco (Case C-182/13); Cañas v Nexea Gestión Documental SA, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (Case C-392/13); USDAW and anor v WW Realisation 1 Ltd (in liquidation) and anor (C-80/14) (the ‘Woolworths’ case). 

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Case Summary Tag: 

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.