GFTU Emplaw Emplaw Emplaw

Mitchell v Barratt Homes (Leeds) Ltd - challenge to EAT's initial rejection of appeal should, in first instance, be by Rule 3(10) hearing

An employment tribunal dismissed Mr Mitchell's claim that he had been unfairly dismissed for whistleblowing, and he appealed to the EAT. In 1 October 2008 HHJ Pugsley dismissed the appeal at the paper sift stage. The letter enclosing this decision advised Mr Mitchell of his rights under EAT Rules of Procedure Rule 3(8) to resubmit his notice of appeal or, under Rule 3(10), to seek an oral hearing.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.