Noor v UKBA - disability discrimination, continuing acts, and PHR decisions
An ET should not decide at a PHR, without making findings on the evidence, that there was no continuing act of discrimination and that a DDA claim was therefore out of time.
This case concerns the presentation of a claim form within the prescribed time, the exercise of discretion, and whether certain of the complaints could be said to be of a continuing act, or to have been barred by the doctrine of issue estoppel from being raised in subsequent tribunal proceedings.
Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.