Peries v Wirefast Ltd - Custom and practice as contractual term [2006] EAT
Mr Peries claimed (i) that he had been wrongly selected for redundancy (ii) that his dismissal was unfair and (iii) that he was contractually entitled to 12 weeks "redeployment pay" and the services of a professional outplacement advisor. This was on the basis that those items were provided for in a staff handbook which he said had contractual force.
Case Summary Tag:
Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.