Peries v Wirefast Ltd - Custom and practice as contractual term [2006] EAT

Mr Peries claimed (i) that he had been wrongly selected for redundancy (ii) that his dismissal was unfair and (iii) that he was contractually entitled to 12 weeks "redeployment pay" and the services of a professional outplacement advisor. This was on the basis that those items were provided for in a staff handbook which he said had contractual force.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.