Royston v The Symphony Group Plc - Selection for redundancy  EAT
Mr Royston was dismissed by reason of redundancy by his employer, a furniture manufacturer. He claimed that the alleged redundancy was a sham and that he had been unfairly dismissed. The Leeds tribunal rejected this, and agreed with the employer that Mr Royston was the only employee in a one-man pool for selection for redundancy, that there had been reasonable consultation and that it had been fair to dismiss him for redundancy.
He appealed. The EAT has dismissed his appeal.