This website uses cookies to help us give you the best experience when you visit our website. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies.
Schiedel Rite-Vent Ltd v Tate - 3 Key questions must be answered when deciding whether to extend time in unfair dismissal case [2008] EAT
Schiedel Rite-Vent Ltd v Tate - 3 Key questions must be answered when deciding whether to extend time in unfair dismissal case [2008] EAT
Mr Tate claimed unfair dismissal. Originally his claim was rejected due to an error on his part in answering certain questions on the form. He resubmitted the claim on 25 February 2008.
The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.