GFTU Emplaw Emplaw Emplaw

Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes UKEAT/0434/13: Equality Act 2010 & Discrimination

In a case that has spent some time journeying up to the Supreme Court and back to tribunal again, the EAT has upheld the tribunal’s decision in Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes that a law firm’s compulsory retirement age of 65 was appropriate and reasonably necessary to achieve the legitimate aims of retention and planning.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.