Shaw v (1) The Cedar Tree Hotel (2) ST6 Ltd (3) Sutton Grosvenor Ltd - amendment to add/substitute new party only where mistake ought to be corrected

ET should only allow an amendment to add or substitute a new party where mistake ought to be corrected was genuine mistake and was not misleading

This case is about ET procedure in amending a response form. Ms Shaw claimed that shortly after the takeover of the hotel she resigned, and in an EJ judgment, the first Judgment, an award of £26,111.28 was made in respect of claims of unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions of wages. The company was not present or represented.