Shaw v (1) The Cedar Tree Hotel (2) ST6 Ltd (3) Sutton Grosvenor Ltd - amendment to add/substitute new party only where mistake ought to be corrected

ET should only allow an amendment to add or substitute a new party where mistake ought to be corrected was genuine mistake and was not misleading

This case is about ET procedure in amending a response form. Ms Shaw claimed that shortly after the takeover of the hotel she resigned, and in an EJ judgment, the first Judgment, an award of £26,111.28 was made in respect of claims of unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions of wages. The company was not present or represented.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.