GFTU Emplaw Emplaw Emplaw

Sutton v The Ranch Ltd - Costs [2006] EAT

The EAT dismissed an appeal brought by an employee seeking costs for the failure of the employers to submit a response to his claim.

The EAT  held that Rule 38(4) of the ET Rules of Procedure only allows for a costs order to be made in cases where a response has not been accepted.  It  did not apply in this case because the employer had not played any part in the proceedings.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.