Tarn v Hughes & Ors  UKEAT 0064/18
ET’s order to select only certain events for consideration at full hearing was perverse
Ms Tarn is a GP, who formerly worked in partnership with Hughes and others, a GP practice (the Surgery). She pursued various claims of sex and pregnancy discrimination, harassment and victimisation before the ET and the parties agreed a list of issues, identifying 30 separate acts about which Ms Tarn was complaining. It was clear that there would be some overlap in terms of the evidence the ET would need to hear relevant to the different issues.