Unilever UK Plc v (1) Hickson (2) Sodexo Ltd - detrimental act must not be conflated with its consequences when considering time limits

When deciding, for the purposes of time limits, whether there has been a continuing act of detriment, a tribunal must take care not to find this by conflating an individual act with its consequences.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.