United States of America v Nolan EAT - conditions for qualifying as an "appropriate representative" of employees for redundancy consultation

Only "appropriate representatives" within the meaning of TULRCA 1992 s.188 can bring claims for protective award about failure to consult over employee redundancies. This case considers what that involves and also confirms that if closure of operations and dismissals are inextricably interlinked, the duty to consult includes a duty to consult over the reasons for the closure.

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Login or subscribe (includes subscription information) to access the full content of this page.