Emplaw
Published on Emplaw (https://www.emplaw.co.uk)

Home > Clifton v Lloyds TSB Bank Ltd - whistleblowing claim should not have been struck out without hearing evidence

Clifton v Lloyds TSB Bank Ltd - whistleblowing claim should not have been struck out without hearing evidence

A claim where core facts are in dispute - such as here, where it was alleged that the true reason for dismissal was the making of a protected disclosure and not ill-health - will not, as a general rule, be amenable to strike-out at a PHR, on the grounds that it has no reasonable prospects of success, without hearing full oral evidence. 

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

  • Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version [1]

Source URL: https://www.emplaw.co.uk/lawguide/clifton-v-lloyds-tsb-bank-ltd-whistleblowing-claim-should-not-have-been-struck-out-without

Links
[1] https://www.emplaw.co.uk/print/lawguide/clifton-v-lloyds-tsb-bank-ltd-whistleblowing-claim-should-not-have-been-struck-out-without