EAT hold that ET were right to reach decision on fair dismissal, even though EJ disagreed. EJ's conclusions ran contrary to fact and, to some extent, amounted to substitution.
EAT hold that ET were right to reach decision on fair dismissal, even though EJ disagreed. EJ's conclusions ran contrary to fact and, to some extent, amounted to substitution.
Links
[1] https://www.emplaw.co.uk/print/lawguide/mccafferty-v-royal-mail-group-ltd