Emplaw
Published on Emplaw (https://www.emplaw.co.uk)

Home > Osborne v Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, EAT - tribunal rulings must do more than merely set out factors to be considered and a conclusion [2009] EAT

Osborne v Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, EAT - tribunal rulings must do more than merely set out factors to be considered and a conclusion [2009] EAT

Ms Osborne started work as a trainee medical technical officer with the Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust in April 2000. She claimed that, not long after that, she had developed a disability (chronic fatigue syndrome). As a result, she stopped working in July 2000 and did not return. It seems that under NHS rules she was still on 80% pay. In March 2006, when she was almost ready to return to work, her employment was terminated on the grounds of capability. 

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Case Summary Tag: 
Enforcement: Employment Tribunals etc. [1]
  • Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version [2]

Source URL: https://www.emplaw.co.uk/lawguide/osborne-v-royal-brompton-harefield-nhs-trust-eat-tribunal-rulings-must-do-more-merely-set

Links
[1] https://www.emplaw.co.uk/case-summary-tags/enforcement-employment-tribunals-etc
[2] https://www.emplaw.co.uk/print/lawguide/osborne-v-royal-brompton-harefield-nhs-trust-eat-tribunal-rulings-must-do-more-merely-set