In refusing to adjourn a substantive hearing on medical grounds, the tribunal erred in law by coming to its own "near medical conclusions", contrary to medical evidence produced by the claimant in support of his application.
In refusing to adjourn a substantive hearing on medical grounds, the tribunal erred in law by coming to its own "near medical conclusions", contrary to medical evidence produced by the claimant in support of his application.
Links
[1] https://www.emplaw.co.uk/print/lawguide/pye-v-queen-mary-university-london-adjournments-tribunal-should-not-reach-near-medical