Emplaw
Published on Emplaw (https://www.emplaw.co.uk)

Home > Rana v London Borough of Ealing & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2074

Rana v London Borough of Ealing & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2074

Rightful use of EAT's discretion to extend time for appeals to the EAT where ET reasons were mis-sent

 

The provision governing the time limit for appeals to the EAT is rule 3(3) of the EAT Rules 1993 [1] (as amended). The rule is rather elaborate, because it deals separately with a variety of different ways in which the ET's judgment or the reasons for it may be promulgated. The relevant part reads:

The full content of this page is available to subscribers only. Please purchase a subscription if you feel this content will be of use to you.

Case Summary Tag: 
Enforcement: Employment Tribunals etc./EAT procedure [2]
  • Printer-friendly version [3]

Source URL: https://www.emplaw.co.uk/lawguide/rana-v-london-borough-ealing-anor-2018-ewca-civ-2074

Links
[1] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/401795/employment-appeal-tribunal-rules.pdf
[2] https://www.emplaw.co.uk/case-summary-tags/enforcement-employment-tribunals-etceat-procedure
[3] https://www.emplaw.co.uk/print/lawguide/rana-v-london-borough-ealing-anor-2018-ewca-civ-2074